On a closed list of grounds. Anything outside it — including "inexpedient" — is not a lawful refusal.
The grounds for refusing a registration or re-registration are enumerated, and the regulation forecloses any addition to them: refusal of registration or re-registration on other grounds, including on grounds of inexpediency, is not permitted. The list is dominated by things an applicant controls — the duty, the completeness of the file, the address, the name, the capital, whether the right organ approved the documents — rather than by any assessment of the business. (Registration Regulation, Paras. 40, 45 — lex.uz ↗)
Some grounds attach to particular filings rather than to registration at large. A joint-stock company is refused without one or more foreign investors holding not less than fifteen per cent of the charter fund; an enterprise with foreign investment is refused where the foreign share stated in the founding documents does not match the share the law sets for that status; a market or trade complex is refused without a local government body holding at least fifty-one per cent; and a capital change or share transfer is refused where an investigating body or a court has imposed a prohibition. (Registration Regulation, Paras. 41, 42, 43, 44 — lex.uz ↗)
None of it is established by asking. The disqualifying circumstances are found by integrating into the System the information systems of the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Tax Committee, the Supreme Court and the Department for Combating Economic Crimes — which is why a refusal on those grounds arrives during the filing rather than weeks afterwards. (Registration Regulation, Para. 40¹ — lex.uz ↗)
Answer a few questions and the full cost — one-off and monthly — is on the screen in minutes.
Part of the answer bank — 132 questions, each cited to the article it rests on.