Fix the ground and file again. The duty is lost, but the registrar cannot invent a new objection.
A refusal is a document, not a silence. The responsible officer draws it up through the System on the prescribed form within the same deadline the filing itself had, sets out the reasoned grounds with the specific legal norms relied on, and notifies the applicant by the means given in the request. Because the grounds are a closed list, the refusal is checkable: an objection that names no norm is not one the act contemplates. (Registration Regulation, Paras. 40, 45, 47 — lex.uz ↗)
Refusal does not close the door. The regulation says it is no obstacle to submitting documents again, provided the grounds for refusal have been eliminated. What it does cost is the duty, which is not returned. On a re-filed change to the charter fund or a share transfer the registrar has four working hours and — the provision worth knowing — may not raise grounds it did not raise before, save those bearing on whether the earlier ground was actually cured. (Registration Regulation, Paras. 46, 48 — lex.uz ↗)
Answer a few questions and the full cost — one-off and monthly — is on the screen in minutes.
Part of the answer bank — 132 questions, each cited to the article it rests on.