The state compensates on a court decision, from the body’s own funds — then recovers from the official.
Two acts answer this and they fit together. The Investment Law provides that losses caused to a person carrying on investment activity by an unlawful administrative act of a state body or official are subject to compensation by the state on a court decision, met in the first place out of the relevant body’s off-budget funds and then recovered from the official responsible by way of recourse. Decisions that restrict investors’ rights, and unlawful interference in their business, are compensable on the same footing. (Investment Law, Art. 62 — lex.uz ↗)
The 2018 decree adds the good-faith case, which is the more common one. An investor who relied on the legal force of an administrative act — used property, made a transaction, took the benefits it offered — and then saw that act annulled is compensated for the resulting loss; and the question of cancelling or altering an act that affects a good-faith investor’s lawful interests is one for a court, unless leaving it in place would threaten the public interest. Harm from unlawful decisions, acts or inaction is compensated in full from targeted funds established for the purpose. (Decree UP-5495, Paras. 1, 1¹ — lex.uz ↗)
Accounting keeps the books and makes every filing on time, with monthly reports in English.
Part of the answer bank — 195 questions, each cited to the article it rests on.